Looking back on my preliminary task, and comparing it to my finished magazine, i think the difference is clear between the two that i have most definately improved on my photoshopping skills as the project has gone on. I already had a brief knowledge of photoshop, but i feel that as i have wanted to do different things with my magazine, i have taught myself how to do them using tutorials and help from my teacher (for example, wrapping text around an image like i did on my DPS and my contents page).
Obviously, i wanted to put a lot more effort into my actual magazine as apose to my college magazine prelimiary task, so, when i thought something would look good i put a lot more effort into finding out how to do it, whereas during the prelimiary task i just changed my idea if i couldn't work out how to do something because i realised it wasn't as important as my final piece.
Also, when doing my final magazine, i put in a lot more research into other pages and how they go about certain things to produce a magazine (what is conventional). This is why, i think, my prelimary task looked so unproffesional and tacky, because i had no knowledge of other magazines, but once i looked into others (Vogue, especially), i became aware of the types of things i needed to include and how to go about including them. I think the contrast of this is shown when i compare my prelimiary task contents page to my final contents page.
I learnt a lot of new techniques when using photoshop that helped me to develop my work andmake it the best it could be. When i created my contents on the preliminary task, i had the text wrapped around my models head, whereas in my final product, i learnt how to create a box that moulded to the shape of my model so i could continue to write and the text would work its own way around. I also learnt a lot more about the softening and sharpening tool, If there was any areas that weren't so good, or could do with a bit of blending (such as when i made Vicky's hair a bit 'bigger'), The softening tool worked wonderfully to produce the effect i was going for. Once i'd used this, i would then sharpen the areas i wanted to stand out the most (Such as the eyes - Subjective gaze is always sexy and needs emphasizing), this would then detract the eye away from my softened areas. The softening tool also came in very handy after i had used the clone tool (another new one i was learning to use), once i had cloned an area, to cover up any inperfections, i would soften the edges to make the whole thing a lot less harsh and noticeable.
Also, as i put more effort into my final magazine, I did a lot more research into my audience and what makes them 'click'/how i would appeal to them. I researched magazines my audience are attracted too and looked at all different things about it, from the font's to the composition, and the articles to the way they're written. I realised that these magazines had a main focus of attention to detail and keeping everything minimal and chic - So i also did. I also did a lot of research into Lady Gaga when writing my article, in an attempt to make it as believable as possible. I do think that research, and learning many new techniques is one of the main reasons why my magazine was a success.
No comments:
Post a Comment